In a beautiful victory for President Trump, the usually liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just ruled for the President in the ongoing sanctuary city battle.
Los Angeles sued after President Trump decided that any city harboring illegal immigrants via sanctuary policies would no longer receive certain federal funds.
Looks like he was right and now everyone hopes that this may get these cities to start following the law.
The Hill reported that on Friday the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Trump administration’s efforts to prioritize federal dollars for local policing to towns and cities that complied with certain immigration policies.
The court ruling, a split 2-1 decision, said the Department of Justice (DOJ) has the rights to withhold Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grants from sanctuary cities and states over their refusal to work with federal immigration enforcement authorities and instead prioritize agencies that focused on unauthorized immigration and who agreed to give ICE access to jail records and immigrants in custody.
The city of Los Angeles first sued Trump’s administration after it was denied a $3 million grant on the grounds that it did not receive the money because it didn’t focus on immigration for its community policing grant application. The decision reversed a district court’s ruling.
“The panel rejected Los Angeles’s argument that DOJ’s practice of giving additional consideration to applicants that choose to further the two specified federal goals violated the Constitution’s Spending Clause,” wrote Judge Sandra Ikuta, joined by Judge Jay Bybee.
“The panel held that DOJ did not exceed its statutory authority in awarding bonus points to applicants that selected the illegal immigration focus area or that agreed to the Certification,” she wrote.
Judge Kim Wardlaw also wrote in dissent that the Justice Department’s efforts to prioritize immigration in determining the awarding of COPS grants was “Orwellian” and said the majority’s ruling goes “astray.”
“The majority goes astray by finding no meaning in Congress’s use of the term ‘community-oriented policing’ and then deferring under Chevron to DOJ’s Orwellian effort to define ‘community-oriented policing’ to include ‘partnering with federal law enforcement to address illegal immigration,’ ” she wrote.
“Congress did not authorize COPS grants for anything other than placing additional state and local cops on the beat and promote community partnerships,” she wrote.
