In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court decided that Florida can enforce a law barring ex-felons from voting if they still owe court fines or fees that they are unable to pay associated with their convictions
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan dissented.
On Thursday, Yahoo reported that the Supreme Court refused to let Florida felons who completed their sentences vote in a primary without first paying fees, fines and restitution, as the state requires.
Voting rights groups said the requirement was unconstitutional, given that state voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2018 giving hundreds of thousands of felons the right to vote. The requirement will remain in effect while the case is heard next month by a federal appeals court.
The unsigned order was opposed by liberal Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. Sotomayor said it “prevents thousands of otherwise eligible voters from participating in Florida’s primary election simply because they are poor.”
“Under this scheme, nearly a million otherwise-eligible citizens cannot vote unless they pay money,” Sotomayor said, calling it a “voter paywall.”
The dispute over the voting rights of Florida’s felons could be crucial in the 2020 elections because of its perennial status as a swing state. There are about 775,000 felons in the state who have completed their prison sentences, including about 85,000 who registered to vote.
Most states restore felons’ right to vote after their sentences, along with time on parole or probation, are complete. Many states impose additional requirements. Florida is among 11 states with the most restrictive rules, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Florida voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2018 allowing felons to vote after their sentences are complete. The initiative won 64% approval.
The state Legislature passed, and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed, a law requiring that felons first pay all fees, fines and restitution owed as part of the process.
That restriction was challenged by voting rights groups, and in May, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle struck it down as a “pay-to-vote system.” This month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit blocked Hinkle’s ruling and scheduled a hearing for Aug. 18 – the date of the state primary. The registration deadline to vote is next Monday.
Voting rights groups told the Supreme Court that Florida’s system amounts to a “poll tax” that violates the 24th Amendment to the Constitution.
“This is a deeply disappointing decision,” said Paul Smith, vice president of the Campaign Legal Center, which led the opposition to Florida’s rule. “Florida’s voters spoke loud and clear when nearly two-thirds of them supported rights restoration at the ballot box in 2018.”
In legal papers, the voting rights groups said most felons “cannot afford to pay what they owe.” Even those who can usually can’t figure out what they owe years after their convictions, the added.
