Author: Tod Nace

Melania’s Spokeswoman Blasts ‘The View’ Hosts For Their ‘Petty, Mean-Girl Spirit’ Against The First Lady

Stephanie Grisham, First lady Melania Trump’s spokeswoman slammed “The View” hosts Tuesday after they devoted time on the show to attack Melania Trump over a resurfaced body double conspiracy.

“I’ve always found it sad that a group of women spend so much time attacking another woman, whose only goal is to help children,” Grisham wrote.

”Yesterday’s show went beyond the petty, mean-girl spirit that we’ve grown accustomed to.”

“People died, people lost family, people are hurting in Alabama,” she added.

“I watched the president and first lady hug, listen to, and comfort people who had lost everything – and the ‘ladies’ of The View instead chose to laugh and joke about a body double conspiracy.”

Grisham continued, “They really should consider devoting that air time to helping people.”

On Monday, the first lady’s spokeswoman tweeted to the ABC daytime talk show, calling it “shameful” that they had dedicated time to “laugh” at the conspiracy about the first lady after President Trump and FLOTUS traveled to the tornado-ravaged area of Alabama to comfort those who lost loved ones in the storm.

“@flotus & @potus traveled to Alabama to pay their respects & comfort victims of the tornado devastation. In typical fashion, @theview chooses to laugh in the face of tragedy. Shameful,” Grisham wrote on Twitter.

The headline from “The View” read, “FAKE MELANIA CONSPIRACIES RETURN: The internet is buzzing again with theories that first lady Melania Trump is using an impostor to stand in for her — the co-hosts investigate,” along with a clip from the show Monday.

During the episode, the co-hosts had a few laughs about the conspiracy. At one point, Joy Behar said that the reason a rumor like this can catch on at all is because “there is an element of truth to the idea that she [Melania] doesn’t want to spend time with him [Trump].”

VIDEO: Jay Leno Torches Late Night Shows For Their ‘One-Sided’ Politics

Former “Tonight Show” host Jay Leno said that he doesn’t miss hosting his late-night gig because now “everyone has to know your politics.”

Leno Suggested that the current host have failed to learn what he learned from Johnny Carson: not to let yourself appear to be “one-sided.“

During his appearance on NBC’s “TODAY” on Tuesday, the hosts of the show began an exchange by saying, “So it’s been five years since you left ‘The Tonight Show,’ and you see the place we are right now in this country. Do you miss being on the show? Or is it such a different time that it would be hard to do?” The Hill reported.

“No, it’s different — I don’t miss it,” said Leno. “You know, everything now is if people don’t like your politics — everyone has to know your politics.”

“I kind of used Johnny [Carson]’s model,” he explained. “People couldn’t figure out: ‘Well, you and your Republican friends…’ or ‘Well, Mr. Leno, you and your Democratic buddies…’ And I would get hate mail from both sides equally. And I went, ‘Well that’s fabulous! That’s exactly what I want.'”

The hosts reacted enthusiastically to Jay Leno’s response.

“But when people see you as one-sided, it just makes it tough,” Leno said. “And plus, I did it when, you know, Clinton was horny and Bush was dumb, and it was just a little easier,” he added, a sentence that got even more laughs from the NBC team.

“You know, now it’s all very serious, everything so, so na—” he said, stopping himself mid-line. “I’d just like to see a bit of civility come back to it, you know?”

“People say, ‘Oh, it must be easy to do jokes with Trump,'” Leno continued. “No, it’s actually harder because the punch line of the joke used to be ‘That’s like the president with a porn star.’ Well, now the president is with a porn star. Where do you go with that?! … How do you get more outrageous than that?! Exactly.”

Asked if he thinks the pendulum will swing back the other way, former host Leno said, “Of course, I think it will swing back the other way.”

Watch the video below (comments begin around the 3:30 mark):

Jay Leno began hosting “The Tonight Show” back in 1987 and took over as full-time host back in 1992, when Johnny Carson retired. He dominated the late-night scene until his retirement back in 2014, when his replacement Jimmy Fallon took the reigns. Fallon drew the outrage of progressive viewers for interviewing Donald Trump back in 2016.

“It just got bigger and out of control,” Jimmy Fallon told The Hollywood Reporter’s Awards Chatter back in June 2018 regarding the backlash against him for inviting on Donald Trump.

“People just jump on the train, and some people don’t even want to hear anything else. They’re like, ‘No, you did that!’ You go, ‘Well, just calm down and just look at the whole thing and actually see my body of work.'” It was “definitely a down time” said Fallon amid all the backlash, and morale really dropped on the show.

“I’m sorry,” he said for having President Trump on his show. “I don’t want to make anyone angry — I never do and I never will. It’s all in the fun of the show. I made a mistake. I’m sorry if I made anyone mad. And, looking back, I would do it differently.”

President Donald Trump responded to host Jimmy Fallon in his well known manner, telling him to “Be a man.”

Meanwhile Jay Leno is no longer hosting a show, he is a regular guest on Tim Allen’s “Last Man Standing,” which is now over at Fox after ABC inexplicably dropped the show, a decision that drew accusations of their political bias.

Sarah Sanders Opens Up On Pelosi’s Impeachment Hold:’It’s Time For Other Democrats To Get on Board’

This Thursday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders spoke about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s call to put a hold on the impeachment talks and suggested that more Democrats need to do the same and work with President Trump to improve the country instead.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders appeared on Fox News and made it clear that she believes moving forward with impeachment is a waste of time and managed to commend Pelosi on the move via a backhanded compliment.

“I think Nancy Pelosi is clearly already starting to lose control of her party. I think we’re seeing that on a lot of the things that have taken place over the last couple of weeks. I’m glad she sees what the rest of us see, and there’s no reason, no cause for impeachment. The president’s done an incredible job on his first two years in office, the country is better than its been in decades, and we’re actually making progress on a number of fronts.” said Sanders.

Despite what Democrats like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton may think, Americans have seen many improvements in their lives during Trump’s presidency.

This is one of the main reasons Sarah Huckabee Sanders believes that this means Democrats should stop focusing on impeachment.

“I think it’s time for other Democrats in Nancy Pelosi’s party to get on board, start doing what they were elected to do. Do their jobs and quit trying to focus so much on making excuses for the historic loss that they suffered in 2016. Let’s work with the president and solve some real problems.” she stated.

The White House press secretary made it clear that the average American is not as focused on impeaching the President and that Democratic lawmakers should follow what is working for the country.

“We’re focused on doing what the American people actually people care about, whether it’s growing the economy, creating jobs … defeating ISIS, rebuilding the military. These are things that people are sitting around in America that they actually care about,” said Sarah Sanders. “That’s because our country is doing better.”

Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ comments come after Nancy Pelosi told the Washington Post she opposes pursuing impeachment. Pelosi explained her decision by saying such a move would divide the country.

VIDEO: Ocasio-Cortez Tries To Roast Wells Fargo’s CEO – Gets Humiliated Instead

This Tuesday, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tried to grill Wells Fargo CEO Timothy Sloan during a House Financial Services Committee Hearing but ended up getting embarrassed.

Democrat Chairwoman Maxine Waters held the hearing and it was titled “Holding Megabanks Accountable: An Examination of Wells Fargo’s Pattern of Consumer Abuses.”

The Los Angeles Times reported: “Sloan was the first megabank chief executive whom Waters, an outspoken critic of Wells Fargo, summoned to appear before the House Financial Services Committee since she took over as its chairwoman in January following the midterm elections that gave Democrats control of the House.”

During the hearing, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez used her time to push her political agenda against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and against the fossil fuel industry.

“Why was the bank involved in the caging of children and financing the caging of children to begin with?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.

“I don’t know how to answer that question because we weren’t,” Sloan responded.

“Uh, so in finan–, you’ve, you were financing, involved in debt financing in CoreCivic and GEO group, correct?” Ocasio-Cortez responded.

“For a period of time, we were involved in financing one of the firms, we are not anymore,” Sloan answered. “I’m not familiar with the specific assertion you are making, we were not involved in that.”

And it only got worse from there.

“Should Wells Fargo be held responsible for the damages incurred by Climate Change due to the financing of fossil fuels and these projects?” Ocasio-Cortez asked.

“I don’t know how’d you calculate that, Congresswoman,” Sloan responded.

“Say from spills, or when we have to reinvest in infrastructure building sea walls from the erosion of, um, from the erosion of infrastructure or cleanups, wildfires, etc…,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

“Related to that pipeline?” Sloan replied. “I’m not aware that there’s been any of what you’ve described that’s occurred that’s related to that pipeline.”

As she got more and more frustrated, Ocasio-Cortez talked over Sloan as he finished answering her question, asking, “How about, uh, the cleans up from the leaks of the Dakota Access pipeline?”

“I’m not aware of the leaks associated with the Dakota Access pipeline that you’re describing,” Sloan responded.

“So, hypothetically, if there was a leak from the Dakota Access pipeline, why shouldn’t Wells Fargo pay for the clean up of it since it paid for the construction of the pipeline itself?”

“Because we don’t operate the pipeline, we provide financing to the company that’s operating the pipeline,” Sloan answered.

“Regulators hit Wells Fargo with a $1-billion fine last year for forcing auto-loan customers into unneeded insurance policies and charging improper fees to some mortgage borrowers,” The Times stated.

“And in a securities filing this month, Wells Fargo said it could be required to pay as much as $2.7 billion more than it had set aside as of the end of December to resolve legal cases, including ongoing probes by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission.” they added.

Timothy Sloan, who has been at Wells Fargo for about 31 years, became the bank’s CEO in October 2016 after John Stumpf was forced out after a pair of disastrous congressional hearings.

Greenpeace Founder Calls It Out: Warns ‘Green New Deal’ Is Leading To ‘End Of Civilization’

This Monday, one of the founders of the environmental group Greenpeace said that the “Green New Deal” pushed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Democratic Party would trigger the end of civilization.

Patrick Moore explained how the “Green New Deal” would lead to catastrophe, from half the population starving to the elimination of every tree on planet earth.

Patrick Moore also took a shot at Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, pointing out that without fossil fuels, “How do you get the food to the center of New York, to Manhattan, where AOC is from? You don’t.”

The Greenpeace founder appeared on Fox News with Tucker Carlson, who noted that Moore had already expressed his hostility to the radical plan, then turned to Moore and queried, “So, you’re one of the founders of the most famous environmental organizations in the world, and you think the ‘Green New Deal’ sounds terrifying. Tell us why.”

Moore responded: “Well, because it would be basically the end of civilization if 85% of the world’s and also 85% of the U.S.’s energy in the form of coal, oil, natural gas were phased out over the next few years, like ten years. We do not have anything to replace them with. Yes, if we went into a crash course of building nuclear reactors, we could replace them for producing electricity. But that isn’t going to happen because the Greens are against nuclear and they are even against hydroelectric dams which at least is renewable. But they don’t support that either. So basically they are opposed to approximately 98.5% of all the electricity that we are using and nearly 100% of all of the vehicle and transportation and ships and planes energy that we are using.”

“So when I tweeted the other day, and it had a huge response, over three million impressions on Twitter, I said, you don’t have a plan to feed eight billion people without fossil fuels or get the food into the cities, where it’s needed. That requires large trucks, and there’s not going to be any electric trucks any time soon hauling forty tons of food into the supermarkets where the people in the cities probably think it originates, in the supermarket. But it does not.”

“It’s coming from farms out in the country, where a few million people are growing the food for all the rest of the population. And if we ban fossil fuels, first, agricultural production would collapse in a very short period of time.”

“There’s these things called tractors and they use fuel, and all the other implements on the farm, and then there’s the transportation.”

“So when you have no fuel, how do you get the food to the center of New York, to Manhattan, where AOC is from? You don’t. Then the people there will begin to starve and that will spread out as a rot from the center of the metropolises all across the country, and half the population will die in a very short period of time.”

“And as I also pointed out, there wouldn’t be a tree left on this planet. Say this was a worldwide thing, because the United States is not going to ban fossil fuels if no one else does; but say the Paris Agreement came into effect, fully all around the world and everybody banned fossil fuels, there wouldn’t be a tree left on this planet because that would be all there was for fuel, for heating and cooking, as they did in the old days, when there was hardly anybody on the planet compared to what there is today.”

“So just that one point, never mind the insanity of banning aircraft and fossil fuel-using vehicles.”

Host Turcker Carlson responded simply, “Well, you’ve just completely blown my mind. And I knew some of that, but the way you put it was really stirring.”

Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore offered a very informative explanation of what would really take place in our world if the Green New Deal is put in place. His life’s work has been dedicated to environmental study, law, science, etc. He should be taken more seriously.

President Trump Is Considering A New Plan & A New Name For Mexican Cartels

This Monday, President Donald Trump made an interview for Breitbart in the Oval Office and stated that he is considering designating Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.

“We’re thinking about doing it very seriously. In fact, we’ve been thinking about it for a long time,” said the President when asked if he was considering the move. “As terrorists — as terrorist organizations, the answer is yes. They are.”

President Trump complained that the Mexican government cannot control the violence, saying “they’ve totally lost control of the cartels. Mexico last year had 42,000 deaths — murders — 42,000. It’s considered one of the most unsafe countries in the world.”

Back in February 2019, GOP lawmakers Chip Roy and Mark Green proposed to designate the Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, enabling the United States Treasury Department to sanction their assets aggressively.

The President has broad authority to designate groups as terrorist organizations under the Immigration and Nationality Act which triggers wider range of actions that the executive branch can take, including: seizing of all property identified, the prohibition of U.S. persons dealing with these organizations, criminal penalties on organizations that do business with them, and many other consequences.

The State Department says the designation of foreign terrorist groups depends on whether “the terrorist activity or terrorism of the organization threatens the security of United States nationals or the national security of the United States.”

Back in February, Todd Bensman explained for the Center for Immigration Studies that “foreign terrorist organization designation opens a whole new armory of American weaponry that can be used to debilitate the cartels and all who lend support and assistance to them, just like ISIS.”

He also noted the tools that our Government can be use against the cartels: “prosecution of associates for “material support”, the freezing of a broader range of funds, immigration restrictions on all members of the organizations, and travel restrictions on many others. These tools would add to already significant counter-cartel assets already in use.”

Ilhan Omar Responds To Fox News For Publicly Condemning Jeanine Pirro

This Monday, Rep. Ilhan Omar thanked Fox News Network for supporting her and condemning Judge Jeanine for talking about her hijab.

Jeanine Pirro made a few comments on her Sunday show about Rep. Ilhan Omar that have prompted rebukes from both the right and left, as well as her own media network.

“Think about it: Omar wears a hijab, which, according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia Law — which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” said Pirro.

The next day, Fox News said Judge Jeanine’s remarks does not reflect the network’s.

“We strongly condemn Judge Jeanine Pirro’s comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar,” the network said in a statement to Mediaite on Sunday. “They do not reflect those of the network and we have addressed the matter with her directly.”

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) thanked the network for condeming Jeanine Pirro’s remakrs on her Twitter profile.

“Thank you, @FoxNews,” Omar tweeted to her more than 720,000 followers. “No one’s commitment to our constitution should be questioned because of their faith or country of birth.” posted Omar.

Sarah Sanders & Jim Acosta Exchange Blows Over President Trump’s Comments That Dems ‘Hate’ Jewish People

This Monday afternoon, Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta debated on whether or not Democrats “hate” Jewish people.

Jim Acosta’s questions came as a follow-up to ABC News’ Jonathan Karl, who inquired about the report that the President made the claim about the Dems in a speech on Friday to donors at Mar-a-Lago.

“Just to get back to [Karl] and his questions about the president’s comments about Democrats and Jewish people. Isn’t that kind of rhetoric just sort of beneath everybody?” Acosta asked.

“Do you think that the president has thought at all going into this 2020 campaign that the rhetoric just needs to be lowered, whether it’s talking about Democrats, the media, immigrants. Or should we just plan on hearing the president use the same kind of language that we heard in 2016 and all through the first couple years of his administration?” he continued.

Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders responded saying: “Look, I think that the real shame in all of this is that Democrats are perfectly capable of coming together and agreeing on the fact that they’re comfortable ripping babies straight from a mother’s womb or killing a baby after birth, but they have a hard time condemning the type of comments from Congresswoman Omar. I think that is a great shame. The president has been clear on what his position is. Certainly what his support is for the people and community of Israel.”

“You’re saying something that’s just patently untrue,” Acosta answered. “Democrats don’t hate Jewish people. That’s just silly. It’s not true.”

Sanders responded, “I think they should call out their members by name and we’ve made that clear.”

CNN’s Acosta proceeded to bring up the KKK incident in Charlottesville, Virginia from back in August of 2017.

The President’s comments during the speech in question were made in response to Democratic Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. She questioned if some members of Congress have a “dual loyalty” to the United States and Israel last week, which was just one of many instances that have led some to call her anti-Semitic.

The comments sparked condemnation on both sides of the political aisle and inspired a divisive House resolution condemning all types of hate and bigotry.

Dolly Parton ‘Did Not Approve’ Elizabeth Warren’s Use of ‘9 to 5’ In Her Campaign

Country legend Dolly Parton scorched Elizabeth Warren and her Trump-hating campaign after she found out that the far-left senator hijacked her song “9 to 5” and is using it as her official campaign theme song.

The 73-year-old Grammy Award winner usually stays out of politics, but this time Democratic presidential candidate went too far.

Dolly Parton isn’t playing games after she learned the far-left senator Elizabeth Warren hijacked one of her favorite songs and is using it as her number one campaign song.

First of all, Dolly Parton wasn’t confused about why Warren is using the “9 to 5” tune. The lyrics surely point to the horrible boss from the movie of the same name, and the 73-year-old country icon knows Warren was using her lyrics to degrade President Donald Trump, along with the lies the senator is telling about his policies.

Parton’s song lyrics read in part:

Workin’ 9 to 5, what a way to make a livin’
Barely gettin’ by, it’s all takin’ and no givin’
They just use your mind and they never give you credit
It’s enough to drive you crazy if you let it
9 to 5, for service and devotion
You would think that I would deserve a fat promotion
Want to move ahead but the boss won’t seem to let me
I swear sometimes that man is out to get me!

9 to 5, yeah
They got you where they want you
There’s a better life
And you dream about it, don’t you
It’s a rich man’s game
No matter what they call it
And you spend your life
Puttin’ money in his wallet

After Dolly Parton heard that the people over at Warren’s campaign were using her song, she immediately got hold of her manager.“Parton’s manager, Danny Nozell, revealed that not only did Warren use the song without permission, but that the singer doesn’t ever allow her songs to be involved with any political campaigns,” Fox News reports.

“We did not approve the request, and we do not approve requests like this of (a) political nature,” Nozell told The Associated Press.

CEO of CTK Management, Nozell, didn’t respond to questions about whether Parton’s team might register any formal complaint about Warren’s use of the song.

“If Parton escalates the matter, there’s no shortage of precedent: The late Tom Petty reportedly sent a cease-and-desist letter to Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., over the use of his song American Girl in her 2011 campaign, and former President George W. Bush got a similar letter from Petty over his choice of the singer’s I Won’t Back Down during the 2000 campaign,” Breitbart reports.

Parton is very proud that she didn’t get caught up with the other Hollywood celebrities who use their fame to lecture Americans on politics. But, just last month after her own sister called Dolly out for not speaking out on behalf of the #MeToo movement, which has been hijacked by the left, the country singer responded.

When a leftist reporter asked Dolly Parton if she is a “feminist” and supports the Women’s March, the reporter was aghast when Parton “wrinkled her nose” in disgust. “I don’t think … I mean, I must be if being a feminist means I’m all for women, yes. But I don’t feel I have to march, hold up a sign or label myself,” said Parton. “I think the way I have conducted my life and my business and myself speaks for itself. I don’t think of it as being feminist. It’s not a label I have to put on myself. I’m just all for gals.”

It’s nice to hear Dolly say “But I don’t feel I have to march, hold up a sign or label myself?” as she is referring to the Trump-haters in the Women’s March like Jane Fonda, Madonna, and Ashley Judd.

She is Dolly Parton, and she isn’t going to “label” herself a rabid feminist to make Oprah Winfrey or anyone in the Hollywood crowd happy.

And now she isn’t going to let “Pocohantas” Warren use her beautiful song to push her far-left agenda. Dolly has said numerous times the gift God gave her was musical, and that’s all she wants to share with all Americans.

America needs more celebrities like Dolly Parton. She loves America and refuses to take part in anything that tears down and divides our country.

Conservatives Are Bringing The Heat On Ocasio-Cortez After She Suggested Reagan Was Racist

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is facing huge backlash from conservatives all over he country after criticizing former President Ronald Reagan and suggesting he was racist.

During her appearance at South-by-Southwest Conference & Festivals, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made a few comments in which she stated that Reagan’s handling of welfare was a perfect example of pitting people against each other.

“One perfect example, I think a perfect example of how special interests and the powerful have pitted white working-class Americans against brown and black working-class Americans in order to just screw over all working-class Americans, is Reaganism in the ’80s when he started talking about welfare queens. So you think about this image of welfare queens and what he was really trying to talk about was … this like really resentful vision of essentially black women who were doing nothing that were ‘sucks’ on our country.” said Ocasio-Cortez.

Many conservatives felt the need to point out how wrong Ocasio-Cortez’s comments were and how Ronald Reagan did the opposite of what she was claiming.

“[Ocasio-Cortez] cheers for socialism while wearing $1000 suits and eating at 5 star restaurants. All provided to her by the benefits of Capitalism,” tweeted Andrew Pollack. “She wants you to suffer under high taxes and oppression while she thrives as a privileged congresswoman.”

“I first voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 – he unified all workers for their economic advantage and success – the Blue Dog democrats supported him and he was reelected in a landslide 1984 – apparently @AOC believes that Orwell’s “1984” is a “how to” manual to rewrite history ” tweeted Tony Shaffer.

Radio host Larry Elder also joined in with a perfect example of how Reagan help the black community back in the days.

“Watch [Ocasio-Cortez] accuse President Ronald Reagan of utilizing racism to ‘screw over all working-class Americans.’ (Oh, so THAT explains how Reagan carried 49 states in ’84. Black unemployment fell faster than did white unemployment. Black businesses grew faster than white owned ones.),” said Elder.

“There is no evidence that [Ocasio-Cortez] ever picked up a book on President Ronald Reagan, so she would not know he created over 18 million jobs during his eight years in office and kicked off a 26 year run of economic growth,” said Reagan biographer Craig Shirley.

Exit mobile version